Let be an alphabet. We define an encoding scheme as follows:
.
Let denote the i-th prime number .
For a non-empty string , where each , define .
For a non-empty sequence of stings from , define
Which of the following numbers is the encoding, , of a non-empty sequence of strings?
View worked solution
Answer: B
To find which number represents a valid encoding , let us analyze the definitions of and :
- For any non-empty string , the encoding is defined as: where . Thus, the exponent of each prime factor in must belong to the set .
- The sequence encoding is defined as:
The given options are all of the form for . For , we must have: Let us test which value of can be a valid for some string :
- For : We can write . Since , this matches the definition of for a single-character string (where ). Thus, .
Choosing , we get: This is a valid encoding. - For other options:
- (exponents must be in and prime factors must start with ).
- (exponent is invalid, and prime is missing).
- (exponents are , which is invalid).
Free practice · Your answers on this page are not saved.
