From the following instance of a relation schema , we can conclude that:
View worked solution
Answer: C
To determine which options are correct, we must understand a fundamental property of functional dependencies (FDs):
- A functional dependency is a semantic constraint that must hold for all possible instances of a relation schema.
- A single relation instance can disprove (falsify) a functional dependency if we find a violation.
- However, a single relation instance can never prove that a functional dependency holds for the schema, as future valid instances might violate it.
Let's analyze the given instance of relation :
1. Testing :
Look at the first two tuples:
- Tuple 1:
- Tuple 2:
Here, the values are identical (), but the corresponding values are different ( and ). This is a direct violation of the dependency .
Therefore, we can conclusively state that does not functionally determine ().
2. Testing :
In this specific instance, for every identical value of , the values of are also identical:
- For ,
- For ,
While the dependency is satisfied by this specific instance, we cannot conclude that holds as a schema-level constraint, because a future instance might violate it.
Conclusion:
- We can definitely conclude that does not functionally determine (Option C).
- We cannot conclude that functionally determines , which makes Option B incorrect.
Thus, the correct option is C.
Free practice · Your answers on this page are not saved.
