Consider the following two statements.
- : If a candidate is known to be corrupt, then he will not be elected
- : If a candidate is kind, he will be elected
Which one of the following statements follows from and as per sound inference rules of logic?
View worked solution
Answer: C
Let us define the following propositional variables for a candidate:
- : The candidate is known to be corrupt.
- : The candidate is elected.
- : The candidate is kind.
We can translate the given statements and into logical implications:
- : If a candidate is known to be corrupt, then he will not be elected.
- : If a candidate is kind, he will be elected.
Using the law of contrapositive, can be rewritten as:
Now, applying the rule of hypothetical syllogism (transitivity of implication) to and the contrapositive of :
Translating the inferred statement back into English:
"If a person is kind, then he is not known to be corrupt."
This corresponds to Option C.
Free practice · Your answers on this page are not saved.
