Answer: B
A proposition is a tautology if it is true under all possible truth value assignments for its constituent variables.
Let us analyze each option:
Option B: a∧b→b∨c
An implication of the form P→Q is false if and only if the antecedent P is True and the consequent Q is False.
- Let the antecedent P=a∧b. For P to be True, both a and b must be True.
- If b is True, then the consequent Q=b∨c must also be True (since T∨c≡T).
Since it is impossible for the antecedent to be True while the consequent is False, the implication a∧b→b∨c is always True. Thus, it is a tautology.
Eliminating other options:
- Option A: a∨b→b∧c
If we assign a=True, b=False, and c=False:
True∨False→False∧False⟹True→False≡False
Hence, it is not a tautology.
- Option C: a∨b→(b→c)
If we assign a=True, b=True, and c=False:
True∨True→(True→False)⟹True→False≡False
Hence, it is not a tautology.
- Option D: a→b→(b→c)
If we assign a=True, b=True, and c=False:
Whether parsed as (a→b)→(b→c) or a→(b→(b→c)), this expression evaluates to False. Hence, it is not a tautology.