Answer: B
We are given that both of the following propositional formulae are tautologies:
- F1∧F2→F3
- F1∧F2→∼F3
Let P=F1∧F2. The given conditions can be written as:
P→F3≡True
P→∼F3≡True
Using the implication equivalence A→B≡∼A∨B, we get:
∼P∨F3≡True— (1)
∼P∨∼F3≡True— (2)
Taking the logical conjunction of equations (1) and (2):
(∼P∨F3)∧(∼P∨∼F3)≡True
Applying the distributive law:
∼P∨(F3∧∼F3)≡True
Since F3∧∼F3≡False (a contradiction), this simplifies to:
∼P∨False≡True
∼P≡True⟹P≡False
Substituting P=F1∧F2 back, we get:
F1∧F2≡False
Since the conjunction F1∧F2 is always false (a contradiction), it is not satisfiable.
Therefore, Option B is the correct statement.