Skip to content
Official PYQ · 2016

GATE CS 2016 Set 1 Q44 — Undecidability

Explain with AI

Let XX be a recursive language and YY be a recursively enumerable but not recursive language. Let WW  and ZZ be two languages such that Y‾\overline{Y} reduces to WW, and ZZ reduces to X‾\overline{X} (reduction means the standard many-one reduction). Which one of the following statements is TRUE?

Choose one option
View worked solution

Answer: C

To determine the properties of the languages WW and ZZ, we use the standard closure properties of many-one reductions (lem\\le_m):

  1. If A≤mBA \le_m B and BB is Recursive (REC), then AA is Recursive (REC).
  2. If A≤mBA \le_m B and BB is Recursively Enumerable (RE), then AA is Recursively Enumerable (RE).
  3. If LL is REC, then its complement L‾\overline{L} is also REC.
  4. If LL is RE but not REC, then its complement L‾\overline{L} is not RE.

Step 1: Analyze Language ZZ

  • We are given that XX is recursive (REC).
  • Therefore, its complement X‾\overline{X} is also recursive (REC).
  • We are given Z≤mX‾Z \le_m \overline{X}.
  • Since X‾\overline{X} is recursive, any language that reduces to it must also be recursive. Thus, ZZ is recursive.

Step 2: Analyze Language WW

  • We are given that YY is RE but not recursive.
  • Therefore, its complement Y‾\overline{Y} is not RE (it is co-RE but not RE).
  • We are given Y‾≤mW\overline{Y} \le_m W.
  • By contrapositive of property (2), if WW were RE, then Y‾\overline{Y} would also have to be RE. Since Y‾\overline{Y} is not RE, WW cannot be RE (i.e., WW is not recursively enumerable).

Conclusion

  • WW is not recursively enumerable.
  • ZZ is recursive.

This matches Option C.

Free practice · Your answers on this page are not saved.

Published
Report a correction
Keep exploringMore Undecidability questions